واکاوی عوامل سوق دهنده و بازدارنده بروز رهبری زهرآگین در سازمانهای امروزی مبتنی بر تکنیک فراترکیب

•   آرشیو : نسخه تابستان 1401 - جلد اول
•   کد پذیرش : 12103
•   موضوع : سایر شاخه های مدیریت
• نویسنده/گان : | محمد جواد تقی پوریان، مریم محمدعلیزاده بجاربنه، بهزاد فرخ سرشت، حسنعلی آقاجانی
•   زبان : فارسی
•   نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
•   چکیده مقاله به فارسی : اهداف: سمیت پدیده ای است که نظام های انسانی را فرا می گیرد و واقعیتی ناگزیر در زندگی سازمانی محسوب می شود. از مدیران گرفته تا کارکنان منابع انسانی و مشاوران سازمان، همه با پویایی های سمی و آثار کژکارکردی آن مواجه شده اند. با درک این مهم، پژوهش حاضر به شناسایی عوامل سوق دهنده و بازدارنده بروز رهبری زهرآگین در سازمانهای امروزی، پرداخته است. روش مطالعه: با استفاده از تکنیک فراترکیب، یافته های مطالعات داخلی و خارجی مرتبط، بصورت نظام مند با روش هفت مرحله ایSandelowski و Barroso بررسی گردید. کدهای شناسایی شده با استفاده از نرم افزار MAXQDA10، طبقه بندی گردید و برای سنجش پایایی و کنترل کیفیت از روش کاپا و نرم افزار SPSSاستفاده شد و ضریب کاپا محاسبه شده برابر با 892/0بوده که در سطح توافق معتبر قرار گرفت. یافته ها: از بین 480 مقاله، 34 مقاله منتخب و بر اساس آنها 167 عامل در4 مقوله اصلی و 14 کد محوری شناسایی و دسته بندی شدند که عبارتند از: ویژگی های فردی رهبر شامل ویژگی های شخصیتی، روانشناختی و نگرشی، کاستی های مدیریتی - فردی، رفتارهای غیرمنتظره- پیش بینی نشده، رفتارهای خودپرستانه- خودترویجی، رفتارهای ماکیاولگرایانه، سیاست دفعی مدیر، استبداد خرد)، ویژگی های پیروان (ویژگی های رفتاری- شخصیتی، فروماندگی پیروان، تطابق، تبانی)، ویژگی های سازمان (فرایندهای سازمانی و مدیریت ناکارآمد، ساختار سازمانی بیگانه) و ویژگی های محیط برون سازمانی (فرهنگ و سیاست). نتیجه گیری:با توجه به اهمیت ویژگی های رهبری برگرفته از مقالات، به سازمانها توصیه می شود که در نحوه استخدام و بکارگیری رهبران، دقت فزاینده ای مبذول دارند.
•   لیست منابع : [1] Afacan Findikli, M., Okan, G., Sigri, U. (2019). Karanlık Liderlik Ölçeği: Çalışanların Algısı Üzerine Bir Ölçeklendirme Çalışması. Nitel Sosyal Bilimler-Qualitative Social Sciences. 1(1): 89-115.
  [2] Alizadeh, F., Hadavi Nejad, M. (2019). The anti-elite exploration process in the organization is based on the interpretive mapping scheme of data theory. Organizational Resource Management Research, 9 (1): 166-183. In Persian
  [3] Arbogast, M.S.(2018).Egos Gone Wild:Threat Detection and the Domains Indicative of Toxic Leadership. doctoraldissertations of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.Department of psychology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida.https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7664.
  [4] Asadzadeh, S. (2015). Designing the Interpretive Structural Model of Zohragin Organization: A Case Study in the Executive Organizations of Rafsanjan. Master Thesis in Public Management, Organizational Transformation, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics. 91 pages. In Persian
  [5] Ashforth, B.E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47: 755–778. http://doi:10.1177/001872679404700701.
  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247717438
  [6] Atmadja, T. (2019). Workplace Toxicity, Leadership Behaviors, and Leadership Strategies. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University.170 p.
  [7] Azen, I., Madden, T.(1986). Prediction of goal directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2: 453-474.
  [8] Bakhtiari, Z., Hadavi Nejad, M. (2018). Causal mapping of the colloquial following model of the colluders. Organizational Resource Management Research, 8 (2): 39-55. In Persian
  [9] Baloyi, G.T. (2020). Toxicity of leadership and its impact on employees: Exploring the dynamics of leadership in an academic setting. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies,76(2): a5949. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i2.5949
  [10] Başar,U.,Sığrı,Ü.,Basım, N.(2016).Obscure leadership in the workplace. Job and Human Magazine, 3(2): 65-76.https://doi:10.18394/iid.61037.
  [11] Brown, C.P. (2019). The Employee Perspective: A Phenomenological Approach to the After Effects of Toxic Leadership. Doctorial Dissertation of Philosophy in Management, Sullivan University.280 p.
  [12] Cankaya, M., Ciftci, G.E. (2020). Hastane Çalisanlarinin Toksik Liderlik ve Örgutsel Sinizm Algilarinin Örgutsel Bagliliklarina Etkisi. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 23(2): 273-298.
  [13] Çelmece,N., Isiklar, A. (2019). Impact of the perception of Toxic Leadership of healthcare profesionals on OrganIzational Commitment and Quality of Work Life. International Journal of Humanities and Social Development Research, 3(2): 7-20.
  DOI: https://doi.org/10.30546/2523-4331.2019.3.2.7
  [14] Cetin, U.O.I. (2019). Yikici Liderlerde Etik Disi Davranislar. Balkan and Never Eastern jornal of social sciences, 5(2):108-119.
  [15] Daudi, P. (2013). On the art of leading other through the art of leading oneself online course materials, Management Consulting and Change Management, Linnaeus University.
  [16] Dehghani Soltani, Mehdi., Mesbahi, Maryam., Mirza Sadeghi, Naeimeh. (2020). The Impact of Poisonous Leadership on Organizational Trauma by Promoting Hypocritical and Machiavellian Behaviors. Journal of Human Resources Studies, 10 (3): 159-184.
  http://doi:10.22034/jhrs.2020.236600.1441. In Persian
  [17] Dinc, M.A. (2019). Zehirli Liderligin bazi onculleri ve ardillari.Yuksek Lisans Tezi ,Ankara Yildirim Behazit Universitesi. 133 p.
  [18] Dobbs, J. M., Do, J. J. (2019). The Impact of Perceived Toxic Leadership on Cynicism in Officer Candidates. Armed Forces & Society, 45(1): 3-26. http://DOI:10.1177/0095327X17747204
  [19] Ghaed Amini Harouni, A., Ebrahimzadeh Dastjerdi, R., Sadeghi Deh Cheshmeh, M., Sadeghzadeh, N. (2018). Identifying the structural model of the relationship between poisonous leadership and harvest management in the Azad University of Isfahan (Khorasgan). Educational Management Innovations, 13 (4 (52)): 25-42. In Persian
  [20] Ghasempour, H., Wise, S. M. (2020). Investigating the effect of poisonous leadership style on the emergence of the desire to leave voluntary service; Explain the mediating role of organizational silence. Journal of Human Resource Management and Support Development, 15 (57): 56-82. In Persian
  [21] Gurlek, M., Yesiltas, M. (2020). The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Service Sabotage: A Mediation and Moderation Analysis. An International Journal of Akdeniz University Tourism Faculty, 8(1): 151-176. http://DOI:10.30519/ahtr.695159.
  [22] Hadavi Nejad, M., Klondi, M. (2016). Exploring the antecedent dynamics of poisonous leadership using interpretive structural modeling. Quarterly Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies, 5 (3 (19)):1- 24. In Persian
  [23] Hadavi Nejad,M., Klondi, M. (2017). Consequences of poisonous immoral leadership in the organization. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology, 12 (3): 121-131. In Persian
  [24] Hamby, J.M. (2018). The Role of Employee Attributes in the Mitigation of Toxic Leadership Impact on Employee Behaviors. Doctoral Dissertation of Management, Graduate School of the University of Maryland University College. 154 P.
  [25] Harris A., Jones, M. (2018). The dark side of leadership and management. School Leadership & Management, 38(5): 475-477.
  [26] Henriques, P.L., Curado, C., Jeronimo, H. M., Martins, J. (2019). Facing the Dark Side: How Leadership Destroys Organisational Innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation,14(1): 18-23. ISSN: 0718-2724. (http://jotmi.org)
  [27] Hinen, A. L. (2019). Phenomenological Study of Toxic Leadership in the U.S. Military. Doctoral Dissertation of Business Administration Department of Information Systems and Decision Sciences Muma College of Business University of South Florida.248 P.
  [28] Kahveci, G., Bahadır, E., Kandemir, I. K. (2019). Okul Yöneticilerinin Toksik Liderlik Davranışları İle Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılıkları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Gökhan Kahveci, Elif Bahadır ve İlknur Karagül Kandemir,52(1):225- 249.http://DOI:10.30964/auebfd.420616.
  [29] Khakpour, A. (2019). The Relationship between Poisonous Leadership and Emotional Burnout; The mediating role of organizational silence. Social Psychology Research, 34: 118-103. In Persian
  [30] Klondi, M. (2015). Exploring the poisonous leadership process using interpretive structural modeling: a case study in the executive organizations of Rafsanjan. Master Thesis in Public Management with a focus on Organizational Transformation, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics. 125 pages. In Persian
  [31] Kazemi, R. (2019). Investigating the moderating role of employee flexibility in the relationship between toxic leadership and non-civil behavior. Master Thesis in Public Management, Human Resources and Labor Relations, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. In Persian
  [32] Khalili, c. (2018). The effect of poisonous (toxic) leadership style on social idleness with the role of sub-mediator on employees (Case study: Ilam Petrochemical Company). Journal of Human Resources Management in the Oil Industry, 36: 139-158. In Persian
  [33] Kretzschmar, L. (2019).An ethical analysis of big man” and “inner ring” leadership in South Africa: The example of Jacob Zuma and the resistance of Thuli Madonsela, in S. Jung, V. Kessler, L. Kretzschmar & E. Meier (eds.). Metaphors for leading – Leading by metaphors,17–27, V & R Unipress, Göttingen.
  [34] Lipman-Blumen, J. (2011). Toxic leadership: A rejoinder.Representation, 47(3): 331-342.
  [35] Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), 370.
  [36] Mirzaei Fatehabad, S., Farahbakhsh, S. (2019). Investigating the Relationship between Poisonous Leadership Leadership and Teachers' Organizational Silence with the Mediation of Organizational Culture of Primary Schools in Khorramabad. Two specialized scientific quarterly journals of research in primary education, 1 (2): 28-42. In Persian
  [37] Mohammad Zaheri, M., Vahdati, H., Sepahvand, R., Nazarpour, A. H. (2019). Investigating the effect of poisonous leadership on organizational silence with the mediating variable of moral courage. Journal of Resource Management in Law Enforcement, 7 (3): 175-202. In Persian
  [38] Padilla, A., Hogan, R., Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly,18(3):176-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001
  [39] Padilla, A., Hogan, R., Kaiser, R. (2015). The toxic triangle: destructive leaders, susceptible followers and conductive environment. Quarterly of leadership, 13(8): 94-176.
  [40] Peltokorpi, V. (2018). Abusive supervision and emotional exhaustion: The moderating role of power distance orientation and the mediating role of interaction avoidance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 38(8): 1151–1166.
  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12188
  [41] Pradhan, S., Jena, L. K. (2017). Effect of abusive supervision on employee’s intention to quit and the neutralizing role of meaningful work in Indian IT organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5): 825–838. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2017-1107
  [42] Sabok Ro, M., Bagheri Qarabolagh, H., Mohammadi, F. (2018). An Analysis of the Precedents of Poisonous Leadership Behavior of Sports Media Employees and Its Impact on Job Satisfaction: Emphasizing the Mediating Role of Unified Civilization. Communication Management in Sports Media, 6 (22): 55-68. In Persian
  [43] Salimi, F., Hadavi Nejad, M. (2020). An Inquiry into Employees' Perceptions of Fanatic Obedience Using Zaltmann's Metaphorical Extraction Technique. Organizational Culture Management, 18 (3): 539-560. In Persian . http://jomc.ut.ac.ir
  [44] Sandelowski. M., Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company, New York.
  [45] Schmidt, A.A.(2014).An examination of Toxic leadership, job outcomes, and the impact of military development. Doctoral dissertation. The Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland. 125 P. https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/15250.
  [46] Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6): 783-791.
  [47] Seyed Javadin, S. R., Gholipour, A., Janalizadeh Shoki, M. (2014). A review of the phenomenon of poisonous leadership and the possibility of its occurrence in different stages of the organization's life cycle. Management and Development Process, 28 (2 (92)): 3-17. In Persian
  [48] Uysal, H.T. (2019). The Mediation Role of Toxic Leadership in the Effect of Job Stress on Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Business, 24(1):56-73.
  [49] Whicker, M.L. (1996). Toxic leaders: When organizations go bad. Praeger, Westport, CT.
  [50] Yalçınsoy, A., Işık, M. (2018). Toksik Liderlik İle Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti İlişkisine Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 17(3): 1016-1025. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.373835
  [51] Zare, F., Sepahvand, R. (2019). Investigating the role of poisonous leadership style on organizational trauma with regard to the mediating role of organizational silence (Case study: Azad University and Payame Noor Shiraz staff). Journal of New Approach in Educational Management, 10 (1 (37)): 190-216. In Persian. http://jedu.miau.ac.ir.
•   کلمات کلیدی به فارسی : رهبری زهرآگین، رفتارهای ماکیاولگرایانه، تکنیک فراترکیب، رهبری مخرب، رهبری تاریک.
•   چکیده مقاله به انگلیسی : Objectives: Toxicity is a phenomenon that pervades human systems and is an inevitable reality in organizational life. From managers to human resources staff and consultants to the organization, everyone is faced with toxic dynamics and its dysfunctional effects. Understanding this important, the present study has identified the factors driving and inhibiting the emergence of toxic leadership in today`s organizations.
  Methods: By using meta- synthesis technique, the findings of the related internal and external studies were systematically analized using Sandelowski and Barroso seven – step method. The identified codes were classified, analyzed and interpreted by MAXQDA10. Kappa method and SPSS werw used to measure reliability and quality control. The calculated kappa coefficient was 0.892, which indicated a good consistency.
  Results: Out of 480 articles, 34 articles were selected and based on them, 167 factors were identified and categorized in 4 main categories and 14 core codes that include Leader Characteristics( Individual ( Personality, Psychological, Attitude), Managerial – Individual Shortcomings, Unexpected – Unforeseen Behaviors, Selfish- Self-promoting Behaviors, Machivellian Behaviors, Manager's repulsion policy, Petty tyranny), Characteristics of followers( Behavioral- Personality, Helplessness of followers, Matching, Collusion), Characteristics of Organization( Organizational Processes and Inefficient management, Alien Organizational Structure) and Extra- Organizational Environment( Culture and Politics).
  Conclusion: Given the importance of leadership characteristics derived from articles, organizations are advised to be extra careful in how they hire and employ leaders.
•   کلمات کلیدی به انگلیسی : Toxic Leadership, Machiavellian behaviors, Meta- Synthesis Technique, Destructive Leadership,Dark Leadership
•  صفحات : 101-119
•   دانلود فایل ( 541.08 KB )