چرخش سازمانی در جنگ داخلی آمریکا تحت رهبری آبراهام لینکلن

•   آرشیو : نسخه زمستان 1403
•   کد پذیرش : 12241
•   موضوع : سایر شاخه ها
• نویسنده/گان : | احمد عالی
•   زبان : فارسی
•   نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
•   چکیده مقاله به فارسی : مقاله حاضر به بررسی مفهوم چرخش سازمانی و فرآیندهای مرتبط با آن، به عنوان یکی از موضوعات حائز اهمیت حوزه مدیریت و سازمان، می‌پردازد. این مقاله با استفاده از مطالعه موردی جنگ داخلی آمریکا و اقدامات آبراهام لینکلن به تحلیل چالش‌ها و استراتژی‌های مدیریتی در شرایط بحرانی می‌پردازد و مراحل چرخش سازمانی، از جمله شناسایی مشکلات، تثبیت وضعیت، مدیریت ذینفعان، و اهمیت رهبری را در این فرآیند مورد مطالعه قرار می‌دهد. مقاله همچنین تأثیر سرعت و شدت افول بر چرخش سازمانی و نقش سبک‌های رهبری کاریزماتیک و تحول‌گرا در موفقیت این فرآیند را مورد توجه قرار می‌دهد. از طریق چرخش سازمانی لینکلن و دولت او، نیروهای ایالات متحده (اتحادیه) بر تهدیدهای مرتبط با بقای کشور غلبه کردند، در اقدامات نظامی بازنگری کردند، آمریکا را دوباره متحد و در عین حال به برده داری در سرتاسر ایالات متحده پایان دادند. نتایج این مطالعه نشان می‌دهد چرخش سازمانی، یک فرآیند پیچیده و غیرخطی است که ممکن است در چندین مرحله و توأم با چالش صورت پذیرد. همچنین، یادگیری سازمانی و توانایی مدیران در تطبیق با شرایط جدید از جمله عوامل کلیدی در موفقیت چرخش سازمانی به شمار می‌روند. مقاله به پژوهشگران پیشنهاد می‌کند تا به بررسی بیشتر ابعاد مختلف چرخش سازمانی و تأثیرات آن بر عملکرد سازمان‌ها بپردازند.
•   لیست منابع : 1) پالمر، رابرت روزول. (1396). تاریخ جهان نو (جلد دوم). ابوالقاسم طاهری، چاپ نهم، تهران، ایران: مؤسسه انتشارات امیرکبیر.
  2) دولتشاه، پیمان؛ یزدخواستی، علی و مزروعی نصرآبادی، اسماعیل. (1398). طراحی فرآیند چرخش بنگاه‌های کوچک و متوسط در مرحله افول (مورد مطالعه: شرکت‌های فعال در صنعت مواد غذایی). دو فصلنامه پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی، (2)11، 184-151.
  3) رابرتس، جان موریس. (1395). تاریخ جهان: تاریخ تحلیلی جهان (از آغاز تا پایان قرن بیستم). منوچهر شادان، چاپ سوم، تهران، ایران: انتشارات بهجت.
  4) عالی، احمد و زاهدی، شمس السادات. (1398). مقایسه‌ی تأثیر دو سبک رهبری تحول‌گرا و تسهیم‌شده بر روی خلاقیت تیمی با نقش میانجی اشتراک‌گذاری دانش. فصلنامه چشم‌انداز مدیریت دولتی، (2)10، 70-41.
  5) غفوری، علی. (1393). صد جنگ بزرگ تاریخ. چاپ ششم، تهران، ایران: انتشارات هیرمند
  6) هولسلگ، جاناتان. (1399). تاریخ سیاسی جهان. محسن عسکری جهقی، چاپ اول، تهران، ایران: مؤسسه انتشارات نگاه.
  7) Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Publishing in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1), 1-8.
  8) Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G., & Yeh, K. (2008). Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43, 385-399.
  9) Ahlstrom, D., Lamond, D., & Ding, Z. (2009). Reexamining some management lessons from military history. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26, 617-642.
  10) Ahlstrom, D., & Wang, L. C. (2009). Groupthink and France’s defeat in the 1940 campaign. Journal of Management History, 15, 159-177.
  11) Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  12) Ambrose, S. (1962). Halleck: Lincoln’s chief of staff. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
  13) Arogyaswamy, K., Barker, V. L., III., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1995). Firm turnarounds: An integrative two-stage model. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 493-525.
  14) Avolio, B., Bass, B., & Jung, D. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462.
  15) Barker, V., III., & Duhaime, I. (1997). Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 13-38.
  16) Barker, V., III., & Mone, M. (1994). Retrenchment: Cause of turnaround or consequence of decline? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 395-405.
  17) Barker, V., III., & Mone, M. (1998). The mechanistic structure shift and strategic reorientation in declining firms attempting turnaround. Human Relations, 51, 1227-1258.
  18) Barker, V., III., Patterson, P., Jr., & Mueller, G. C. (2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 235-270.
  19) Barr, P., Stimpert, J., & Huff, A. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 15-36.
  20) Basler, R. C. (Ed.). (1954-1955).The collected works of Abraham Lincoln (Vol. 5). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  21) Bass, B. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  22) Bass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  23) Belz, H. (2006). Lincoln’s construction of the executive power in the secession crisis. Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, 27, 13-38.
  24) Beringer, R., Hattaway, H., Jones, A., & Still, W., Jr. (1986). Why the South lost the Civil War. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  25) Bruton, G., Ahlstrom, D., & Wan, J. (2003). Turnaround in East Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic Overseas Chinese communities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 519-540.
  26) Bruton, G. D., & Rubanik, Y. (1997). Turnaround of high technology firms in Russia: The case of Micron. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 68-79.
  27) Cameron, K., Kim, M., & Whetton, D. (1987). Organizational effects of decline and turbulence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 222-240.
  28) Carwardine, R. (2003). Lincoln: Profiles in power. London, England: Longman.
  29) Castrogiovanni, G., Baliga, B., & Kidwell, R., Jr. (1992). Curing sick businesses: Changing CEOs in turnaround efforts. Academy of Management Executive, 6(3), 26-41.
  30) Castrogiovanni, G., & Bruton, G. (2000). Business turnaround process following acquisitions: Reconsidering the role of retrenchment. Journal of Business Research, 48, 25-34.
  31) Chattopadhyay, P., Glick, W. and Huber, G. (2001). Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 937-955.
  32) Chambers, J. W. (Ed.). (2000). The oxford companion to American military history. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  33) Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harvard Business Review, 81, 66-74.
  34) Clausewitz, C. (1956). On war (J. J. Graham, Trans.). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  35) Cohen, E. (2002). Supreme command: Soldiers, statesmen and leadership in wartime. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
  36) Collins, J. (2001). Good to great. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  37) Commager, H., Current, R., Williams, T., Graebner, N., Donald, D., & Potter, D. (1996). Why the North won the Civil War (Revised paperback edition). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  38) Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  39) Cooke, B. (2003). The denial of slavery in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1895-1918.
  40) Craig, G. A. (1964). The politics of the Prussian army, 1640-1945. New York: Oxford University Press.
  41) Crossan, M., Lane, H., & White, R. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 522-537.
  42) Current, R. (1963). Lincoln and the first shot. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
  43) D’Aveni., R. (1989a). The aftermath of organizational decline: A longitudinal study of the strategic and managerial characteristics of declining organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 577 605.
  44) D’Aveni., R. (1989b). Dependability and organizational bankruptcy: An application of agency and prospect theory. Management Science, 35, 1120-1138.
  45) Davis, W. C. (2000). Lincoln’s men: How President Lincoln became father to an army and a nation. New York, NY: Free Press.
  46) Decker, C. (2018). Stakeholders’ Impact on Turnaround Performance: The Case of German Savings Banks. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(4), 534–554.
  47) Dew, C. (2002). Apostles of disunion: Southern secession commissioners and the causes of the Civil War. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  48) Donald, D. H. (1995). Lincoln. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  49) Donald, D. H. (Ed.). (1962). Why the North won the Civil War. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  50) Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 783-796.
  51) Eicher, D. J. (1996). The Civil War in books: An analytical bibliography. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  52) Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
  53) Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25-32.
  54) Elliott, D., & Smith, D. (2006). Cultural readjustment after crisis: Regulation and learning from crisis with the UK soccer industry. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 289-317.
  55) Ferrier, W., Fhionnlaoich, C., Smith, K., & Grimm, C. (2002). The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: A reconciliation of conflicting views. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 301-316.
  56) Filatotchev, I., & Toms, S. (2006). Corporate governance and financial constraints on strategic turnarounds. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 407-433.
  57) Fiol, C., & Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803-811.
  58) Flood, C. B. (2010). 1864: Lincoln at the gates of history. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  59) Flynn, F., & Staw, B. (2004). Lend me your wallets: The effects of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 309-330.
  60) Foner, E. (2010). The fiery trial: Abraham Lincoln and American slavery. New York, NY: Norton.
  61) Freehling, W. W. (2002). The South vs. The South: How anticonfederate southerners shaped the course of the Civil War. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  62) Gaddis, J. L. (2004). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  63) Gallagher, G. W. (1999). The Confederate War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  64) Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  65) George, A., & Bennett, A. (2004). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  66) Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1465-1474.
  67) Goodwin, D. K. (2005). Team of rivals. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  68) Grattan, R. (2009). The Entente in World War I: A case study in strategy formulation in an alliance. Journal of Management History, 15, 147-158.
  69) Halverson, S., Holladay, C., Kazama, S., & Quinones, M. (2004). Self-sacrificial behavior in crisis situations: The competing roles of behavioral and situational factors. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 263-275.
  70) Hambrick, D., & D’Aveni, R. (1992). Top management deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38, 1445-1466.
  71) Hambrick, D., & Schecter, S. (1983). Turnaround strategies for mature industrial-product business units. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 231-248.
  72) Hamel, G. (2007). The future of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  73) Hattaway, H., & Jones, A. (1991). How the North won: A military history of the Civil War. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  74) Hofer, C. (1980). Turnaround strategies. Journal of Business Strategy, 1, 19-32.
  75) Holzer, H. (2009). Lincoln President-elect: Abraham Lincoln and the great secession winter 1860-1861. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  76) Howe, D. W. (2007). What hath God wrought: The transformation of America, 1815-1848. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  77) Howell, M., & Prevenier, W. (2001). From reliable sources: An introduction to historical methods. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  78) Huang, L., & Snell, R. (2003). Turnaround, corruption and mediocrity: Leadership and governance in three state owned enterprises in Mainland China. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 111-124.
  .......................
•   کلمات کلیدی به فارسی : آبراهام لینکلن، چرخش، افول، جنگ داخلی آمریکا، رهبری، سازمان.
•   چکیده مقاله به انگلیسی : This article examines the concept of organizational turnaround and the processes associated with it, as a significant topic in the field of management and organizations. It analyzes the challenges and management strategies in critical situations through a case study of the American Civil War and the actions of Abraham Lincoln. The article explores the stages of organizational turnaround, including problem identification, situation stabilization, stakeholder management, and the importance of leadership in this process. It also addresses the impact of the speed and intensity of decline on organizational turnaround and the role of charismatic and transformational leadership styles in the success of this process. Through Lincoln's organizational turnaround, the United States (Union) overcame threats to the country's survival, revised military actions, reunified America, and simultaneously ended slavery across the nation. The results of this study indicate that organizational turnaround is a complex and nonlinear process that may occur in several stages and alongside challenges. Additionally, organizational learning and managers' ability to adapt to new conditions are key factors in the success of organizational turnaround. The article encourages researchers to further explore the various dimensions of organizational turnaround and its effects on organizational performance.
•   کلمات کلیدی به انگلیسی : Abraham Lincoln, turnaround, decline, American Civil War, leadership, organization.
•  صفحات : 46-78
•   دانلود فایل ( 719.87 KB )